In my essay submission for this unit I focus on the steady progression of theories on principles of language teaching by leading linguists Berns (1990), Brown (2002) and Ellis (2008), which shows the clearly-emerging focus on learner-centred language teaching. Each theorist posits their own set of principles that are similar, yet distinct.
While much focus is given in the course to the work of Brown, I am aware of the significance of Bern's work on communicative language teaching (CLT).
Berns suggested eight principles of CLT (1990) in which language – whether written or spoken – is seen as a function of, and social tool for, communication. As with first-language, communicative second-language is diverse, with no single prescribed ‘standard’, and with SL acquisition and proficiency being determined inclusive of the learner’s culture and motivation. CLT requires active engagement in “a variety of purposes in all phases of learning” (p. 104) for successful language acquisition. Bern’s principles represent a shift from grammar-, or linguistic-competence of earlier methods to communicative-competence.
How relevant are principles to individual teachers when the setting for language teaching varies so widely?
While teaching and learning settings may vary, the principles of SL teaching should be universal in that they cater to learners as unique individuals (Ellis, 2008, p. 5), holistically adapting teaching to the circumstance, environment, and culture of the learner.
What is the impact of a principles approach for teachers who are convinced that their role is to apply a traditional methods of language teaching?
Linguistics has shifted focus from defined methods that employ set strategies to a greater attention on principles that consider the needs of the individual student, including and not limited to defining SL acquisition success in terms of the student’s motivation and expectation, and a greater focus on communicative competence. The shift of focus from grammar-competence to communicative-competence is about the student, creating student-centred learning. Therefore the principles are critical to modern SL teachers - it is self-evident that teaching based on aging methods will continue to produce the same results of learners who know about a language, but cannot use the language.
Activity 2: Qualities of language teaching are evident in learner-centred approaches to teaching. From the 30 characteristics provided in the guide (1.8), discuss one or two that you value. Explain their importance.
Good Language Teaching Characteristics Technical knowledge
Brown, 1994, p. 430
|
While these characteristics are inarguably important attributes of an effective SL teacher, it would seem that a number are 'container classes' for more detailed points. For example point 7, Has a well thought out, informed approach to language teaching, may be a container that includes the remaining points of the Pedagogical skills category - perhaps point 7 could be considered a subtitle for that category - and also a number of points from the Interpersonal skills category.
While not seeking to ignore the importance of any other characteristics and using point 7 as a platform, I am drawn to characteristic 20, Enjoys people, shows enthusiasm, warmth, rapport, and appropriate humour, and also characteristic 1, Understands the linguistic systems of English phonology, grammar, and discourse. To me, these two characteristics are a complementary pairing of the message and the messenger that provide an effective balance for effective SL teaching and learning. A teacher who demonstrates both of these characteristics will establish genuine relationships with their student(s), between students, and also between the the student(s) and the content. The teacher will offer a learner-centred environment (Nunan, 1988, pp. 24-25) that is openly communicative and performance focused, and yet more discretely includes the acquisition of grammar.
Activity 3: Savignon (2002) attempted to define what abilities communicative competence might encompass with an orientation towards discourse competence and social appropriateness in addition to fluency. What is the role of the teacher in a communicative approach to second language teaching?
English-as-a-SL teaching methods in the 1970s reflected the goal that proficiency be expressed as native-like fluency in a given form of English (e.g. American English) and the teaching roles employed in these methods reflected that purpose. As English is now deemed to be a global language (at least for business) it is important to refine and adapt teaching roles to reflect changing goals. In The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, Renandya discusses (2012) the role of the teacher in three perspectives:
- the traditional set of roles of languages teachers based on educational principles, including "motivator, needs analyst, materials developer, organiser of learning activities, monitor of student learning and provider of language output" (p. 65);
- the set of roles that "may run counter to some of the EIL principles [... including] those that view the teacher as an ambassador of the inner-circle culture, model of the native-speaker variety of English, user of western-based teaching methodology (e.g. communicative language teaching) and promoter of English-only classrooms" (p. 65); and
- finally a proposed set of teacher roles that reflect appropriate principles of EIL, including "promoter of intercultural competence and multiculturalism, promoter of other varieties of English, critical user of course books and teaching methodology" (p. 65).
References
Berns, M. (1990). Contexts
of competence, Social and cultural consideration in communicative language
teaching. New York, USA: Pleneum Press.
Brown, H. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.
Brown, H. (2002). English language teaching in the ‘post-method’ era, Toward better diagnosis, treatment and assessment. In J. Richards & W. Renandya, Methodology in language teaching, An anthology of current practice. pp. 9-18. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press
Ellis, R. (2008). Principles of instructed second language
acquisition. CALdigest. Centre for
Applied Linguistics. Retrieved 17 July, 2013 from http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/instructed2ndlang.html
Nunan, D. (1988) The learner-centred curriculum: A study in second language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Print. Retrieved July 17, 2013 from http://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2j6Nj2Gaoc0C&oi
Renandya, W. (2012) Teacher roles in EIL. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, pp. 65-80.
No comments:
Post a Comment